Sudan at the Crossroads of Empire

Revolution, Counterrevolution, and the UAE’s Subimperial Ambitions

Sudan sits at the fault line of contemporary capitalism. Its gold fields, farmlands, and Red Sea corridors make it a strategic extraction and transit zone; its working-class, neighborhood-based Resistance Committees constitute one of the most advanced experiments in bottom-up governance since the Arab uprisings. The present war is not reducible to “two generals.” It is the violent unravelling of a post-colonial accumulation model and the transnational counterrevolution against a credible popular alternative.

Sudan is the hinge between Africa and the Arab world, between the Sahel and the Red Sea, between production and plunder. Its geography made it a prize for colonial conquest, its labor made it a site of struggle, and its revolution today makes it a threat to the global order that feeds on its subjugation.

Its gold fields, cotton plains, and maritime corridors define it as both resource and route. Whoever commands Sudan controls not only the Nile basin but a key artery of global trade connecting Europe, Asia, and the Horn of Africa. This position has condemned its people to a century of engineered dependency. Yet it has also made them central to every movement of liberation on the continent. The working-class networks that form the Resistance Committees today did not emerge from nothing. They are the latest expression of a continuous struggle by ordinary Sudanese to reclaim the wealth they produce and the life they are denied.

To understand the depth of this moment we have to trace three historical arcs that shaped Sudan’s path: colonial extraction, the security-rent state, and the popular revolution. Each period restructured the same contradiction between the people’s labor and the elite’s control of resources, producing new cycles of revolt and repression.

Historical Foundations of Extraction and Revolt

I. Colonial Extraction (1898–1956)

The Anglo-Egyptian Condominium engineered Sudan for imperial production. The creation of the Gezira Scheme transformed the Nile plains into an industrial cotton appendage for British capital, binding Sudan’s infrastructure,railways, ports, and telegraphs,to the needs of export, while social investment in education and healthcare languished. This dual economy privileged the riverine center and condemned the rural periphery,especially Darfur, South Sudan, and the Nuba Mountains,to administrative neglect and enforced poverty. On independence, the state inherited this architecture: strong enough to extract surplus, too weak to redistribute or address regional inequality. Thus, the seeds of revolt and regional rebellion were sown in the contradiction between metropolitan privilege and marginal abandonment.

II. Military Capitalism and the Security-Rent State (1958–2018)

Post-independence governments oscillated between civilian and military regimes, but all inherited and reproduced the logic of export-oriented accumulation, foreign debt dependence, and military coercion. The discovery of oil brought new riches in the 1990s, but deepened inequalities as only an urban elite centered in Khartoum benefited, while war and famine persisted on the peripheries. When South Sudan seceded in 2011, Sudan lost most of its oil income, pivoting to gold extraction and repression: the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), formalized in 2013 from the Janjaweed, became both the privatized arm of violence and accumulation, taxing trade, exploiting mines, and exporting labor to Gulf wars.

Necropolitics,the power to decide who may live and who must die,has structured the Sudanese state’s relationship to its population since “independence. The combination of austerity, repression, and militarized borders revealed a ruling class willing to administer death in order to preserve its own rule. Whether through the creation of famine in the periphery, the systematic denial of healthcare and education, or the militarized management of “surplus” populations in Darfur and the South, Sudan’s rulers turned vast parts of the country into zones of abandonment, where the lives of millions were made disposable in service of elite accumulation.

The security-rent state replaced production with the sale of violence, entrenching dependency on resource rents rather than fostering development. This transformation hollowed out social support, deepened class antagonisms, and set the stage for revolutionary rupture.

III. The Revolutionary Rupture (2018–Present)

The 2018 uprising was triggered by the collapse of bread prices, yet it confronted an entire system built on exploitation, austerity, and contempt. Sudan’s working class,teachers, engineers, youth, and especially women,organized locally to form Resistance Committees: decentralized, self-governing councils that became the backbone of the revolution. These committees fed the hungry, provided medical care, ensured street defense, and drafted the Revolutionary Charter for Establishing People’s Power: a program for dismantling the deep state, socializing looted wealth, and building a democracy rooted in councils and rural cooperatives.

When the revolution erupted, it was not merely a protest against high prices, but an insurrection against the right of the state and its sponsors to decide who may survive at all. The military and RSF responded with open necropolitical violence: live ammunition at protests, disappearances, and the infamous June 3, 2019 Khartoum massacre, where the bodies of demonstrators were dumped in the Nile to erase their memory. The regime calculated that making examples of martyrs,leaving corpses in the streets, weaponizing terror and rape would destroy the collective hope of the uprising.

Yet the Resistance Committees flipped this logic on its head; where the state sowed death, they organized life,caring for the wounded, burying the dead with dignity, and insisting that solidarity could outlast organized abandonment. The revolution became, at its core, a struggle against necropolitics: a demand that the value of Sudanese lives could no longer be set by markets, generals, or imperial interests. This is why, from the beginning, the fight for bread and dignity in Sudan has always been a fight for the right to live itself.

This alternative was so threatening to Sudan’s elite and their foreign patrons that the counterrevolution was swift, brutal, and globally coordinated. The June 3, 2019 massacre, in which RSF and the army killed and disappeared over a hundred protesters, marked a watershed; but despite such repression, the Resistance Committees persisted, becoming the living laboratory of solidarity amid violence.

These three arcs,colonial extraction, security-rent militarism, and popular re-foundation,trace a single through-line showing that every time Sudan’s ruling classes rebuilt the machinery of accumulation, the people answered with new forms of resistance. The present war is the system’s final convulsion and, potentially, the birth of something beyond it.

Anatomy of the Counterrevolution and Subimperialism

IV. Counterrevolution: Local Agents, Global Backers

The Sudanese counterrevolution unites two faces of the same system: Burhan’s military bureaucracy,an inheritance from colonial and Cold War architecture and Hemedti’s paramilitary logic of privatised violence and rent extraction. Their rivalry is about domination over extraction routes, land, gold fields, and foreign rents. Whenever the revolution threatens their power, the local ruling class is backed by a global hierarchy of interests: the UAE, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and Western financiers all funnel money, weapons, and diplomatic cover to maintain control.

What appears as instability is the functioning of the counterrevolution’s machinery. Western and Gulf actors speak of “stability,” but their real aim is to prevent the emergence of a sovereign working-class alternative.

The biggest driver of this counterrevolution is the UAE, an entity that was created for the sole purpose of counterrevolution against Omani socialists in the 20th century. They know what their role is and they play it without any need for direct orders from the west, like in Sudan. At other times they are used as a tool, an outsourcing of violence and the gathering of mercenaries to flood into an enemy of the west’s land and attempt to erase them. This is what happened in Yemen and seeing it from that prospective shows that the RSF mirrors the UAE in this way. Just as the west outsources its violence to the UAE, the Sudanese government first and then the Emiratis in Yemen, Libya, and now sudan outsourced their violence to the RSF. And all of this to crush a people’s revolt.

V. The UAE’s Corridor: Subimperialism and the Political Economy of War

The United Arab Emirates has become the central external architect of counterrevolution. No longer a mere client, the UAE acts as a subimperial power enforcing the interests of the capitalist core while also building its own logistics empire. Through port investments, military outposts, and gold laundering, the Emirates have embedded themselves across Africa, constructing a trans-African corridor of power.

Over the last decade, the UAE has invested nearly $60 billion in African countries,the fourth-largest foreign investor after China, the EU, and the US. Its real strategy is control of infrastructure: AD Ports Group and DP World, UAE state-owned conglomerates, operate or manage ports from North Africa (Egypt, Algeria) to the Atlantic (Angola, Congo, Guinea), the Indian Ocean (Kenya, Tanzania, Mozambique), and the Red Sea (Egypt, Puntland, Somaliland). At least 70 logistical hubs and countless dry ports stretch deep into Africa’s interior, linking gold, land, and commodities to shipping routes. These are military and political footholds enabling rapid intervention and domination of trade and resource flows.

The UAE’s investments in Red Sea, Horn of Africa, and Atlantic ports,with DP World and AD Ports controlling key nodes form the backbone of its corridor. These provide logistical and strategic leverage, connecting gold and agribusiness extraction to shipping lanes critical for global commerce.

This trans-African imperial corridor is also a web of regional partnerships, military outposts, and logistical networks stretching from the Atlantic to the Red Sea. At every link in the chain, local regimes provide staging grounds, mercenaries, transport routes, and political cover for the UAE’s subimperialist strategy. These are just a few.

Chad has emerged as the UAE’s keystone in the Sahel, enabling covert military supply into Sudan via the Amdjarass airfield.

Libya is the original laboratory for UAE power projection in Africa. For years, Emirati military support flowed to General Haftar, including drone bases, airstrips, and sophisticated weaponry. Libyan territory also serves for smuggling Sudanese gold and transporting arms.Somaliland’s Berbera port operates as both commercial and military outpost for the Emirates, offering staging for operations across the Red Sea

Egypt’s military dictatorship has been propped up by billions in Emirati investment, banking Sisi’s regime in the regional axis of counterrevolution. Egyptian intelligence networks coordinate with the UAE to suppress uprisings, and there are many more.

The RSF, under Hemedti, is the UAE’s spear in Sudan. It controls gold mines, manages violence on behalf of foreign interests, and channels profits through Dubai’s financial system. The UAE bankrolls these forces both as a buffer against Sudan’s military and to suppress revolutionary movements that could spark regional revolts.

Through this circuit, the UAE blends investment, coercion, and counterinsurgency. The RSF launder gold through Dubai, receive weapons and cash in return, and enforce population displacement that clears territory for corporate farming and logistics concessions. Where the state recedes, militarized businesses take over, turning war into a profitable cycle.

Displacement and famine open territory for mining. Looting creates dependency on aid controlled by those funding armed conflict. Each ruined village becomes a future investment zone. Humanitarian crisis a step in the business model of empire.

The Resistance Committees: Dual Power and Revolutionary Democracy

The Resistance Committees are the heart of Sudan’s revolutionary alternative. Rooted in working-class neighborhoods, their structure is the practical realization of revolutionary democracy,a system in which power flows upwards from councils, unions, and cooperatives rather than downwards from generals and investors. The Charter for Establishing People’s Power codifies this: a commitment to dismantling elitist, centralized rule and building sovereignty from below.

Every committee engages in material survival,organizing food relief, clinics, education, and political coordination. They form the nucleus of dual power, capable of governing life where the state collapses. Their call for Transitional Revolutionary Legislative Councils foregoes elite negotiations, demanding real authority for the people and rejecting further compromise with the military or old elite.

This stance which is no negotiations and no legitimacy for killers arises from practical experience and watching the rest of the world. Every collaboration with capital or military elites has enabled counterrevolutionary violence. The Charter demands economic justice alongside political transformation: nationalize key industries, reclaim land, reject IMF/World Bank dependency, and build popular sovereignty. Their program is a living blueprint for transformation and the clearest challenge to both subimperial and imperial rule in the region today.

Sudan as the Hinge of Crisis and Liberation

Sudan’s revolution does not stand alone. It exposes and resists the deep crisis of capitalism in the periphery: debt dependency, ecological collapse, militarized borders, elite capture. War is not a failure but a profitable management regime for external interests. When “development” and straight up nonviolent extraction fails, empire turns to militarization and war.

The Red Sea corridor, ports, and logistics networks make Sudan indispensable to Western and Gulf strategies. Whoever dominates Sudan controls the economic arteries connecting Africa with Asia and Europe. Fierce competition over Port Sudan, Suakin, and Darfur’s mines is is about imperial power in the world-system.

But Sudan also reveals the possibility of rupture. The Resistance Committees demonstrate that direct democracy, economic justice, and mutual aid can sustain life, challenge hierarchy, and offer new paths of development—an example that could reverberate across the continent and the world.

Subimperialism

Theorists describe subimperialism as the condition of regional powers peripheral to Western dominance but exercising their own extractive and coercive surplus within reach of their militaries and investment flows. The UAE is the archetypal case: not fully sovereign, still dependent on US financial and military architecture, but wielding massive influence to suppress democratic movements, discipline outlier elites, and keep dependent states in crisis. Its power is most visible at the level of class struggle in the region targeting those, like Sudan’s Resistance Committees, who seek to break free from both local oligarchy and global empire.

The UAE’s corridor across Africa fuses finance, logistics, and violence. Its logic is exclusionary and extractive: encircle the continent, secure it against revolution, bleed it for gold, labor, and geostrategic utility. Sudan is the linchpin and the proving ground for this strategy: the site where the abolition of counterrevolution would signal a rupture in the politics of endless crisis, managed austerity, and external domination.

As the Sudanese revolutionaries have learned, this is a planetary struggle. Those who defeat subimperialism in Khartoum, Omdurman, and El Fasher show all of Africa and the world what it takes to challenge a system built to deny popular sovereignty.

The UAE’s subimperialism in Africa is a textbook case of how a regional power, dependent on the global capitalist core, can reproduce imperialist practices within its own sphere. In Sudan and beyond, the UAE combines strategic investments, proxy warfare, and client-state development to assert control over resources, trade corridors, and regimes,stabilizing markets for empire while advancing its own interests.

The Subimperial Paradox: Junior Partner, Regional Hegemon

The UAE keeps one foot firmly in the Western imperial camp, aligning military and financial interests, but leverages its autonomy to impose domination across Africa. In forums, it speaks the language of peace and development; on the ground, it employs the methods of covert warfare, economic conquest, and political manipulation. This dual status is the essence of subimperialism, an agent of empire, yet a local architect of domination, able to destabilize entire regions while evading direct accountability.

The Human Cost and Political Lessons

Millions of Sudanese are displaced and hundreds of thousands killed in mass atrocities all as a consequence of a subimperialist system designed to profit from chaos and maintain market discipline. True accountability can only come from confronting not just the UAE, but the broader imperial architecture that enables such interventions.

Conclusion

The Sudanese revolution stands as a mirror for the world, reflecting both the crisis and potential of modern capitalism’s frontier. From the colonial blueprint of extraction, through decades of military and neoliberal accumulation founded on necropolitical rule, to the spontaneous emergence of Resistance Committees organizing life against systemic death, Sudan has exposed the true stakes of class struggle in the periphery.

The revolutionary rupture that began in 2018 was and remains a battle over who holds the power to determine the value of life, the distribution of resources, and the shape of society itself. The military and RSF, backed by global and regional capital, wield necropolitical power to maintain their regime; but the Resistance Committees have built, from ashes and solidarity, the foundation of a popular alternative, mutual aid and democratic organization that defies the logic of market and militarized violence.

Counterrevolution, driven by both local agents and the subimperial ambitions of the UAE, turned Sudan into a battleground for empire. Proxy war, port domination, and gold smuggling reveal the anatomy of imperialism in the twenty-first century, where militarized extraction, client states, and humanitarian crisis serve as instruments for the reproduction of global capital. Yet even as war destroyed infrastructure and displaced millions, it could not erase the revolutionary potential, nor the capacity of ordinary people to build resilient structures for survival and autonomy.

The Resistance Committees enduring, adapting, and refusing compromise with killers remain the decisive force for transformation. Their model of dual power, rooted in local councils, direct democracy, and social justice, points to a new possibility for the whole Global South. Success would mean the collapse of the colonial and postcolonial order; defeat would signal the routinization of crisis as rule. Even splits and setbacks within the movement likedebates over revolutionary strategy are not failures, but moments to clarify and deepen the struggle for working-class leadership and anti-capitalist transformation.

Sudan is the advance guard in the planetary struggle against the necropolitics of imperialism and the extraction that sustains it.Only direct organization of power and production by workers, poor farmers, women, and youth can break the cycle of domination. Capitalism will not fall alone by protest or negotiation,it must be uprooted by the organized, militant action of the oppressed, constructing democracy from below, in every neighborhood and workplace.

The victory of the revolution is a blow against empire everywhere. Its defeat is already our defeat. If the Sudanese counterrevolution wins, militarized capitalism,managed by Gulf capital and local strongmen,will become the model for domination in Africa. If the revolution endures, it will open new possibilities for mass councils, worker cooperatives, and popular sovereignty. Solidarity with Sudan is solidarity yes but it is also strategy. The same system that fuels Sudan’s war privatizes hospitals and impoverishes populations elsewhere. To defend Sudan is to defend the future of liberation.

Sources:

1. “Class, power and revolution in Sudan,” International Socialism. http://isj.org.uk/class-power-and-revolution-in-sudan/

2. “Sudan Dossier: One Year of War: Destroying the Social Fabric of ...,” Migration Control. https://migration-control.info/en/blog/sudan-destruction-of-social-fabric/

3. “Sudan | Revolutionary masses must end generals’ counter ...,” Marxist Workers Party South Africa. https://marxistworkersparty.org.za/?p=4519

4. “The Structural Roots of Sudan’s Ongoing Devastation,” Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung. https://www.rosalux.de/en/news/id/53506/the-structural-roots-of-sudans-ongoing-devastation

5. “A First Victory for the Sudanese Revolution,” Socialist Project. https://socialistproject.ca/2019/04/first-victory-for-sudanese-revolution/

6. “Sustaining Sudan’s Revolution–A Conversation with Rabab Elnaiem,” Middle East Research and Information Project. https://merip.org/2024/04/a-conversation-with-rabab-elnaiem/

7. “The Marxism that is ready to take power,” ROAPE. https://roape.net/2025/06/04/the-marxism-that-is-ready-to-take-power/

8. “Struggle in Sudan: A revolution, not a ‘crisis’,” Liberation News. https://liberationnews.org/struggle-in-sudan-a-revolution-not-a-crisis/

9. “The UAE’s Subimperialism in Sudan,” Spectre Journal. https://spectrejournal.com/uaes-subimperialism-in-sudan/

10. “Sub-Imperial Ambitions - the UAE in Africa,” Rex Alexander McKenzie. https://rexalexandermckenzie.substack.com/p/sub-imperial-ambitions-the-uae-in?action=share

11. “Imperial Outpost UAE in Africa,” Borkena News. https://borkena.com/2025/06/08/uae-imperial-outpost-uae-in-africa/

12. “The emerging sub-imperial role of the United Arab Emirates in Africa,” Transnational Institute. https://www.tni.org/en/article/the-emerging-sub-imperial-role-of-the-united-arab-emirates-in-africa

13. “The emerging sub-imperial role of the United Arab Emirates in Africa,” Links International Journal of Socialist Renewal. https://links.org.au/node/7157

14. “The UAE’s Sub-Imperialist Role in Africa,” The Dark Box. https://the-darkbox.com/the-uaes-subimperialist-role-in-africa/

15. “UAE’s sub-imperial project: Erecting a covert empire across the Red Sea,” The Cradle. https://thecradle.co/articles/uaes-sub-imperial-project-erecting-a-covert-empire-across-the-red-sea

16. “The UAE’s Sub-Imperial Footprint in the Sudan Conflict,” TOAEP. https://www.toaep.org/pbs-pdf/188-gupta/

17. “Evidence of UAE Supplying RSF Continues to Mount,” ADF Magazine. https://adf-magazine.com/2025/01/evidence-of-uae-supplying-rsf-continues-to-mount/

18. “Presence and influence of the Middle Eastern powers in sub-Saharan Africa,” French Middle East Studies. https://fmes-france.org/en/presence-and-influence-of-the-middle-eastern-powers-in-sub-saharan-africa/

19. “The UAE in Africa: Power, Influence and Conflict,” Bloomberg. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2025-07-08/the-uae-in-africa-power-influence-and-conflict

20. “Sudan pound suffers as de facto UAE flight ban hits gold exports,” Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/world/africa/sudan-pound-suffers-de-facto-uae-flight-ban-hits-gold-exports-2025-10-21/

21. “Sudan’s booming wartime gold trade flows through the UAE,” France24. https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20250327-sudan-s-booming-wartime-gold-trade-flows-through-the-uae

22. “Sudan’s booming wartime gold trade flows through the UAE,” RFI. https://www.rfi.fr/en/africa/20250330-sudan-booming-wartime-gold-trade-flows-through-the-uae

23. “Counterrevolution, gold, and global impunity: The UAE’s role,” Links International Journal of Socialist Renewal. https://links.org.au/node/7433

24. “The Passivity or Complicity of BRICS+ with Imperialist Wars,” Socialist Project. https://socialistproject.ca/2025/09/passivity-or-complicity-of-brics-with-imperialist-wars/

25. “The Passivity or Complicity of BRICS+ With Imperialist Wars,” CounterPunch. https://www.counterpunch.org/2025/09/12/the-passivity-or-complicity-of-brics-with-imperialist-wars/

26. “The UAE’s Subimperialism in Sudan,” Diinah. https://diinah.com/the-uaes-subimperialism-in-sudan/

27. “Gold and the war in Sudan | 03 Gold production and trade during the war,” Chatham House. https://www.chathamhouse.org/2025/03/gold-and-war-sudan/03-gold-production-and-trade-during-war

28. “Return of Geopolitical Competition in Africa,” Europe Solidaire Sans Frontières. https://www.europe-solidaire.org/spip.php?article76301

29. “Andreas Krieg: The UAE and secessionist influence in Africa,” Maghrebi. https://maghrebi.org/2025/03/31/andreas-krieg-the-uae-and-secessionist-influence-in-africa/

30. “IntelBrief: The UAE Builds Its Strategic Position in East Africa,” Soufan Center. https://thesoufancenter.org/intelbrief-2024-march-11/

31. “How Congress Can Help Curb the UAE’s Role in Sudan’s Crisis,” Center for American Progress. https://www.americanprogress.org/article/how-congress-can-help-curb-the-uaes-role-in-sudans-crisis/

32. “The UAE’s Long Game in East Africa,” Stratfor. https://worldview.stratfor.com/article/uaes-long-game-east-africa